The Struggle...The Battle Begins...

Anything Goes

The Struggle...The Battle Begins...

Postby NESCAFE_DELIGHTS » Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:55 am

Most people think the theory of evolution was first proposed by
Charles Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and experiments.
However, the truth is that Darwin was not its originator, and neither
does the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory consists of an
adaptation to nature of the ancient dogma of materialist philosophy. Although
it is not backed up by scientific discoveries, the theory is blindly
supported in the name of materialist philosophy.
This fanaticism has resulted in all kinds of disasters. Together with
the spread of Darwinism and the materialist philosophy it supports, the
answer to the question "What is a human being?" has changed. People who
used to answer: "God creates human beings and they have to live according
to the beautiful morality He teaches", have now begun to think that
"Man came into being by chance, and is an animal who developed by
means of the fight for survival." There is a heavy price to pay for this great
deception. Violent ideologies such as racism, fascism and communism,
and many other barbaric world views based on conflict have all drawn
strength from this deception.
This article will examine the disaster Darwinism has visited on the
world and reveal its connection with terrorism, one of the most important
global problems of our time.

The Darwinist Lie: 'Life is conflict'

Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory:
"The development of living things depends on the fight for survival.
The strong win the struggle. The weak are condemned to defeat and
According to Darwin, there is a ruthless struggle for survival and an
eternal conflict in nature. The strong always overcome the weak, and this
enables development to take place. The subtitle he gave to his book The
Origin of Species, "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the
Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life", encapsulates that
Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the 'fight for survival' also applied
between human racial groups. According to that fantastical claim,
'favoured races' were victorious in the struggle. Favoured races, in Darwin's
view, were white Europeans. African or Asian races had lagged behind
in the struggle for survival. Darwin went further, and suggested that
these races would soon lose the "struggle for survival" entirely, and thus
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the
civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage
races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous
apes… will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest
allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more
civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as
low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and
the gorilla.
The Indian anthropologist Lalita Vidyarthi explains how Darwin's
theory of evolution imposed racism on the social sciences:
His (Darwin's) theory of the survival of the fittest was warmly welcomed by
the social scientists of the day, and they believed mankind had achieved various
levels of evolution culminating in the white man's civilization. By the
second half of the nineteenth century racism was accepted as fact by the vast
majority of Western scientists.

Darwin's Source of Inspiration:
Malthus's Theory of Ruthlessness

Darwin's source of inspiration on this subject was the British economist
Thomas Malthus's book An Essay on the Principle of Population. Left to
their own devices, Malthus calculated that the human population increased
rapidly. In his view, the main influences that kept populations
under control were disasters such as war, famine and disease. In short, according to this brutal claim, some people had to die for others to live.
Existence came to mean "permanent war."

In the 19th century, Malthus's ideas were widely accepted. European
upper class intellectuals in particular supported his cruel ideas. In the article

"The Scientific Background of the Nazi 'Race Purification' Programme",
the importance 19th century Europe attached to Malthus's views
on population is described in this way:

In the opening half of the nineteenth century, throughout Europe, members
of the ruling classes gathered to discuss the newly discovered "Population
problem" and to devise ways of implementing the Malthusian mandate, to
increase the mortality rate of the poor: "Instead of recommending cleanliness
to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we
should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and
court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages
near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy
and unwholesome situations," and so forth and so on.

As a result of this cruel policy, the weak, and those who lost the struggle
for survival would be eliminated, and as a result the rapid rise in population
would be balanced out. This so-called "oppression of the poor"
policy was actually carried out in 19th century Britain. An industrial order
was set up in which children of eight and nine were made to work sixteen
hours a day in the coal mines and thousands died from the terrible conditions.
The "struggle for survival" demanded by Malthus's theory led to
millions of Britons leading lives full of suffering.
Influenced by these ideas, Darwin applied this concept of conflict to
all of nature, and proposed that the strong and the fittest emerged victorious
from this war of existence. Moreover, he claimed that the so-called
struggle for survival was a justified and unchangeable law of nature. On
the other hand, he invited people to abandon their religious beliefs by
denying the Creation, and thus undermined at all ethical values that might
prove to be obstacles to the ruthlessness of the "struggle for survival."
Humanity has paid a heavy price in the 20th century for the dissemination
of these callous views which lead people to acts of ruthlessness and

What 'The Law of the Jungle' Led to: Fascism

As Darwinism fed racism in the 19th century, it formed the basis of an ideology that would develop and drown the world in blood in the 20th
century: Nazism.

A strong Darwinist influence can be seen in Nazi ideologues. When
one examines this theory, which was given shape by Adolf Hitler and Alfred
Rosenberg, one comes across such concepts as "natural selection", "selective
mating", and "the struggle for survival between the races", which
are repeated dozens of time in the works of Darwin. When calling his book
Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler was inspired by the Darwinist struggle
for survival and the principle that victory went to the fittest. He particularly
talks about the struggle between the races:

History would culminate in a new millennial empire of unparalleled splendour,
based on a new racial hierarchy ordained by nature herself.

In the 1933 Nuremberg party rally, Hitler proclaimed that "a higher
race subjects to itself a lower race… a right which we see in nature and
which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right".
That the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism is a fact that almost all
historians who are expert in the matter accept. The historian Hickman describes
Darwinism's influence on Hitler as follows:

(Hitler) was a firm believer and preacher of evolution. Whatever the deeper,
profound, complexities of his psychosis, it is certain that [the concept of
struggle was important because]… his book, Mein Kampf, clearly set forth a
number of evolutionary ideas, particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival
of the fittest and the extermination of the weak to produce a better society

Hitler, who emerged with these views, dragged the world to violence
that had never before been seen. Many ethnic and political groups, and especially
the Jews, were exposed to terrible cruelty and slaughter in the
Nazi concentration camps. World War II, which began with the Nazi invasion,
cost 55 million lives. What lay behind the greatest tragedy in world
history was Darwinism's concept of the "struggle for survival."

The Bloody Alliance: Darwinism and Communism

While fascists are found on the right wing of Social Darwinism, the
left wing is occupied by communists. Communists have always been
among the fiercest defenders of Darwin's theory.
This relationship between Darwinism and communism goes right back to the founders of both these "isms". Marx and Engels, the founders
of communism, read Darwin's The Origin of Species as soon as it came out,
and were amazed at its 'dialectical materialist' attitude. The correspondence
between Marx and Engels showed that they saw Darwin's theory as
"containing the basis in natural history for communism". In his book The
Dialectics of Nature, which he wrote under the influence of Darwin, Engels
was full of praise for Darwin, and tried to make his own contribution to
the theory in the chapter "The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from
Ape to Man".

Russian communists who followed in the footsteps of Marx and Engels,
such as Plekhanov, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, all agreed with Darwin's
theory of evolution. Plekhanov, who is seen as the founder of
Russian communism, regarded marxism as "Darwinism in its application
to social science".
Trotsky said, "Darwin's discovery is the highest triumph of the dialectic
in the whole field of organic matter."

'Darwinist education' had a major role in the formation of communist
cadres. For instance, historians note the fact that Stalin was religious in
his youth, but became an atheist primarily because of Darwin's books.8
Mao, who established communist rule in China and killed millions of
people, openly stated that "Chinese socialism is founded upon Darwin
and the theory of evolution."

The Harvard University historian James Reeve Pusey goes into great
detail regarding Darwinism's effect on Mao and Chinese communism in
his research book China and Charles Darwin.

In short, there is an unbreakable link between the theory of evolution
and communism. The theory claims that living things are the product of
chance, and provides a so-called scientific support for atheism. Communism,
an atheist ideology, is for that reason firmly tied to Darwinism.
Moreover, the theory of evolution proposes that development in nature is
possible thanks to conflict (in other words "the struggle for survival") and
supports the concept of "dialectics" which is fundamental to communism.
If we think of the communist concept of "dialectical conflict", which
killed some 120 million people during the 20th century, as a "killing machine"
then we can better understand the dimensions of the disaster that
Darwinism visited on the planet.

(To Be Continued)...

User avatar
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:37 am

Postby kale » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:50 am

Intelligent Design is so much lint and dirt. My faith is with evolution.
User avatar
Posts: 1369
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:28 am
Location: UK

Postby Dazza » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:51 am

I just skimmed through that but am I right in saying you're trying to argue that DARWINISM is responsible for millions of deaths while basking in the peaceful glow of religion? AHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:19 am
Location: South Africa

Postby Extreme Allah » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:56 am

Dazza wrote:I just skimmed through that but am I right in saying you're trying to argue that DARWINISM is responsible for millions of deaths while basking in the peaceful glow of religion? AHAHAHAHAHHAHA.

He's fucking off his tit, D. I stopped even paying attention to him, because in addition to all else, his posts take 15 times as much space to say nothing as anyone I've even seen.
euphoriac wrote:I have been strikingly attracted to natalie since I saw Leon.
User avatar
Extreme Allah
Posts: 8392
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:31 am
Location: Sandals Resort: Somalia

Postby kale » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:58 am

Hitler was Catholic (kinder, kurche, küche) & Stalin ran his state like a church. Anyway the Mao regime didn't kill people -because- it was atheist, in the same way a PLO suicide bomber would kill Natalie because he is Muslim (albeit radical) & she is infidel. Atheism, & its attendant scientism, was at best a sideshow to the mass-slaughters of the last century, & can't plausibly be linked to them as causing factor.
User avatar
Posts: 1369
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:28 am
Location: UK

Postby Herzwerk R.o.D » Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:29 am

kale wrote: Anyway the Mao regime didn't kill people -because- it was atheist

That's irony, right?

Estimate death poll, according to Stéphane Courtois' book "Le livre noir du communisme" (The black book of communism) :

* Rural purges, 1946-49: 2-5M deaths
* Urban purges, 1950-57: 1M
* Great Leap Forward: 20-43M
* Cultural Revolution: 2-7M
* Labor Camps: 20M
* Tibet: 0.6-1.2M
* TOTAL: 44.5 to 72M
The geeks, Natalie Portman, Paris Hilton naked and Britney Spears's cunt shall inherit the Earth.
Herzwerk R.o.D
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: France

Postby Dazza » Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:36 am

What he meant was they weren't killed in the name of atheism, unlike religion which seems to make even decent people do horrible things in its name.
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:19 am
Location: South Africa

Postby Extreme Allah » Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:41 am

There really isn't a great reason to kill, day to day, or in huge mass. It's just not logical, most of the time. It takes some kind of hilariously illogical indoctrination to make people do that kind of thing. Religion has had a monopoly, and and off, on illogical indoctrination for thousands of years.
euphoriac wrote:I have been strikingly attracted to natalie since I saw Leon.
User avatar
Extreme Allah
Posts: 8392
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:31 am
Location: Sandals Resort: Somalia

Postby Herzwerk R.o.D » Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:46 am

Dazza wrote:What he meant was they weren't killed in the name of atheism, unlike religion which seems to make even decent people do horrible things in its name.

Thanks, I didn't understand it like that.

It still makes no sense though, because Stalin and Hitler didn't need religious reasons to kill people (Hitler purged the insane asylums just because they didn't bring anything to the society).
The geeks, Natalie Portman, Paris Hilton naked and Britney Spears's cunt shall inherit the Earth.
Herzwerk R.o.D
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: France

Evolution - Sorry You've been Dooped!! (Fooled) part2

Postby NESCAFE_DELIGHTS » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:04 pm

This is Part 2 of my Post (The Struggle - Let the Battle Begin),

Discussing "The Evolution Deceit of all Time".

Darwinism and Terrorism

As we have so far seen, Darwinism is at the root of various ideologies
of violence that have spelled disaster to mankind in the 20th century. The
fundamental concept behind this understanding and method is "fighting
whoever is not one of us."
We can explain this in the following way: There are different beliefs,
worldviews and philosophies in the world. It is very natural that all these
diverse ideas have traits opposing one another. However, these different
stances can look at each other in one of two ways:

1) They can respect the existence of those who are not like them and
try to establish dialogue with them, employing a humane method. Indeed,
this method conforms with the morality of the Qur'an.

2) They can choose to fight others, and to try to secure an advantage
by damaging them, in other words, to behave like a wild animal. This is a
method employed by materialism, that is, irreligion.

The horror we call terrorism is nothing other than a statement of the
second view.
When we consider the difference between these two approaches, we
can see that the idea of "man as a fighting animal" which Darwinism has
subconsciously imposed on people is particularly influential. Individuals and groups who choose the way of conflict may never have heard of Darwinism
and the principles of that ideology. But at the end of the day they
agree with a view whose philosophical basis rests on Darwinism. What
leads them to believe in the rightness of this view is such Darwinismbased
slogans as "In this world, the strong survive", "Big fish swallow little
ones", "War is a virtue", and "Man advances by waging war".

Darwinism away, and these are nothing but empty slogans.
Actually, when Darwinism is taken away, no philosophy of 'conflict'
remains. The three divine religions that most people in the world believe
in, Islam, Christianity and Judaism, all oppose violence. All three religions
wish to bring peace and harmony to the world, and oppose innocent people
being killed and suffering cruelty and torture. Conflict and violence violate
the morality that God has set out for man, and are abnormal and
unwanted concepts. However, Darwinism sees and portrays conflict and
violence as natural, justified and correct concepts that have to exist.

For this reason, if some people commit terrorism using the concepts and symbols of Islam, Christianity or Judaism in the name of those religions,
you can be sure that those people are not Muslims, Christians or
Jews. They are real Social Darwinists. They hide under a cloak of religion,
but they are not genuine believers. Even if they claim to be serving religion,
they are actually enemies of religion and of believers. That is because
they are ruthlessly committing a crime that religion forbids, and in such a
way as to blacken religion in peoples' eyes.
For this reason, the root of the terrorism that plagues our planet is not
any of the divine religions, but in atheism, and the expression of atheism
in our times: "Darwinism" and "materialism."


Some people who say they are acting in the name of religion may misunderstand
their religion or practice it wrongly. For that reason, it would
be wrong to form ideas about that religion by taking these people as an example.
The best way to understand a religion is to study its divine source.
The holy source of Islam is the Qur'an; and the model of morality in
the Qur'an-Islam-is completely different from the image of it formed in the
minds of some westerners. The Qur'an is based on the concepts of morality,
love, compassion, mercy, humility, sacrifice, tolerance and peace, and a
Muslim who lives by that morality in its true sense will be most polite,
considerate, tolerant, trustworthy and accomodating. He will spread love,
respect, harmony and the joy of living all around him.

Islam is a Religion of Peace and Well-Being

The word Islam is derived from the word meaning "peace" in Arabic.
Islam is a religion revealed to mankind with the intention of presenting a
peacable life through which the infinite compassion and mercy of God manifest
on earth. God calls all people to Islamic morals through through which
mercy, compassion, tolerance and peace can be experienced all over the
world. In Surat al-Baqara verse 208, God addresses the believers as follows:

"You who believe! Enter absolutely into peace (Islam). Do not follow in the
footsteps of Satan. He is an outright enemy to you."

As the verse makes clear, security can only be ensured by 'entering
into Islam', that is, living by the values of the Qur'an.

God Has Condemned Wickedness

God has commanded people to avoid committing evil; He has forbidden
disbelief, immorality, rebellion, cruelty, aggressiveness, murder
and bloodshed. He describes those who fail to obey this command as "following
in Satan's footsteps" and adopting a posture that is openly revealed
to be sinful in the Qur'an. A few of the many verses on this matter in the
Qur'an read:

"But as for those who break God's contract after it has been agreed and
sever what God has commanded to be joined, and cause corruption in the
earth, the curse will be upon them. They will have the Evil Abode."(Surat
ar-Ra'd: 25)

"Seek the abode of the hereafter with what God has given you, without forgetting
your portion of the world. And do good as God has been good to
you. And do not seek to cause mischief on earth. God does not love mischief
makers.'"(Surat al-Qasas: 77)

As we can see, God has forbidden every kind of mischievous acts in
the religion of Islam including terrorism and violence, and condemned
those who commit such deeds. A Muslim lends beauty to the world and
improves it.

Islam Defends Tolerance and Freedom of Speech

Islam is a religion which provides and guarantees freedom of ideas,
thought and life. It has issued commands to prevent and forbid tension,
disputes, slander and even negative thinking among people.
In the same way that it is determinedly opposed to terrorism and all
acts of violence, it has also forbidden even the slightest ideological pressure
to be put on them:

"There is no compulsion in religion. Right guidance has become clearly distinct
from error. Anyone who rejects false gods and believes in God has
grasped the Firmest Handhold, which will never give way. God is All-
Hearing, All-Knowing."(Surat al-Baqara: 256)

"So remind, you need only to remind. You cannot compel them to believe."
(Surat al-Ghashiyah: 22)

Forcing people to believe in a religion or to adopt its forms of belief is
completely contrary to the essence and spirit of Islam. According to Islam,
true faith is only possible with free will and freedom of conscience. Of course, Muslims can advise and encourage each other about the features of
Qur'anic morality, but they will never resort to compulsion, nor any kind
of physical or psychological pressure. Neither will they use any worldly
privilege to turn someone towards religion.

Let us imagine a completely opposite model of society. For example,
a world in which people are forced by law to practice religion. Such a
model of society is completely contrary to Islam because faith and worship
are only of any value when they are directed to God by the free will
of the individual. If a system imposes belief and worship on people, then
they will become religious only out of fear of that system. From the religious
point of view, what really counts is that religion should be lived for
God's good pleasure in an environment where peopls' consciences are totally

God Has Made the Killing of Innocent People Unlawful

According to the Qur'an, one of the greatest sins is to kill a human
being who has committed no fault.

"...If someone kills another person – unless it is in retaliation for someone
else or for causing corruption in the earth – it is as if he had murdered all
mankind. And if anyone gives life to another person, it is as if he had
given life to all mankind. Our Messengers came to them with Clear Signs
but even after that many of them committed outrages in the earth."(Surat
al-Ma'ida: 32)

"Those who do not call on any other deity together with God and do not kill
anyone God has made inviolate, except with the right to do so, and do not
fornicate; anyone who does that will receive an evil punishment."(Surat al-
Furqan: 68}

As the verses suggest, a person who kills innocent people for no reason
is threatened with a great torment. God has revealed that killing even
a single person is as evil as murdering all mankind. A person who observes
God's limits can do no harm to a single human, let alone massacre
thousands of innocent people. Those who assume that they can avoid justice
and thus punishment in this world will never succeed, for they will
have to give an account of their deeds in the presence of God. That is why
believers, who know that they will give an account of their deeds after
death, are very meticulous to observe God's limits.

God Commands Believers to be Compassionate and Merciful

Islamic morality is described in one verse as:

"...To be one of those who believe and urge each other to steadfastness and
urge each other to compassion. Those are the Companions of the Right."(Surat al-Balad: 17-18}

As we have seen in this verse, one of the most important moral precepts
that God has sent down to His servants so that they may receive salvation
and mercy and attain Paradise, is to "urge each other to

Islam as described in the Qur'an is a modern, enlightened, progressive
religion. AMuslim is above all a person of peace; he is tolerant with a
democratic spirit, cultured, enlightened, honest, knowledgeable about art
and science and civilized.
A Muslim educated in the fine moral teaching of the Qur'an, approaches
everyone with the love that Islam expects. He shows respect for
every idea and he values art and aesthetics. He is conciliatory in the face
of every event, diminishing tension and restoring amity. In societies composed
of individuals such as this, there will be a more developed civilization,
a higher social morality, more joy, happiness, justice, security,
abundance and blessings than in the most modern nations of the world

God Has Commanded Tolerance and Forgiveness

The concept of forgiveness and tolerance, described in the words,
'Make allowences for people' (Surat al-A'raf: 199), is one of the most fundamental
tenets of Islam.
When we look at the history of Islam, the way that Muslims have
translated this important feature of Qur'anic morality into the life of society
can be seen quite clearly. Muslims have always brought with them an
atmosphere of freedom and tolerance and destroyed unlawful practices
wherever they have gone. They have enabled people whose religions, languages
and cultures are completely different from one another to live together
in peace and harmony under one roof, and provided peace and
harmony for its own members. One of the most important reasons for the
centuries-long existence of the Ottoman Empire, which spread over an
enormous region, was the atmosphere of tolerance and understanding that
Islam brought with it. Muslims, who have been known for their tolerant
and loving natures for centuries, have always been the most compassionate
and just of people. Within this multi-national structure, all ethnic
groups have been free to live according to their own religions, and their
own rules.
True tolerance can only bring peace and well-being to the world when
implemented along the lines set out in the Qur'an. Attention is drawn to
this fact in a verse which reads:

"A good action and a bad action are not the same. Repel the bad with something
better and, if there is enmity between you and someone else, he will
be like a bosom friend."(Surat al-Fussilat: 34)


All of this shows that the morality that Islam recommends to
mankind brings to the world the virtues of peace, harmony and justice.
The barbarism known as terrorism, that is so preoccupying the world at
present, is the work of ignorant and fanatical people, completely estranged
from Qur'anic morality, and who have absolutely nothing to do with religion.
The solution to these people and groups who try to carry out their
savagery under the mask of religion is the teaching of true Qur'anic morality.
In other words, Islam and Qur'anic morality are solutions to the
scourge of terrorism, not supporters of it.

User avatar
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:37 am

The Struggle...Let the Battle begin..Part 3

Postby NESCAFE_DELIGHTS » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:40 pm

Part 3...


Why the Theoryof Evolution?

For some people the theory of evolution or Darwinism has only scientific
connotations, with seemingly no direct implication in their
daily lives. This is, of course, a common misunderstanding. Far beyond
just being an issue within the framework of the biological sciences,
the theory of evolution constitutes the underpinning of a deceptive philosophy
that has held sway over a large number of people: Materialism.
Materialist philosophy, which accepts only the existence of matter
and presupposes man to be 'a heap of matter', asserts that he is no more
than an animal, with 'conflict' the sole rule of his existence. Although propagated
as a modern philosophy based on science, materialism is in fact an
ancient dogma with no scientific basis. Conceived in Ancient Greece, the
dogma was rediscovered by the atheistic philosophers of the 18th century.
It was then implanted in the 19th century into several science disciplines
by thinkers such as Karl Marx, Charles Darwin and Sigmund Freud. In
other words science was distorted to make room for materialism.
The past two centuries have been a bloody arena of materialism: Ideologies
based on materialism (or competing ideologies arguing against materialism,
yet sharing its basic tenets) have brought permanent violence,
war and chaos to the world. Communism, responsible for the death of 120
million people, is the direct outcome of materialistic philosophy. Fascism,
despite pretending to be an alternative to the materialistic world-view, accepted
the fundamental materialist concept of progress though conflict and
sparked off oppressive regimes, massacres, world wars and genocide.
Besides these two bloody ideologies, individual and social ethics have
also been corrupted by materialism.
The deceptive message of materialism, reducing man to an animal
whose existence is coincidental and with no responsibility to any being,
demolished moral pillars such as love, mercy, self-sacrifice, modesty, honesty
and justice. Having been misled by the materialists' motto "life is a
struggle", people came to see their lives as nothing more than a clash of interests which, in turn, led to life according to the law of the jungle.

"Karl Marx made it clear that Darwin's
theory provided a solid
ground for materialism and thus
also for communism. He also
showed his sympathy to Darwin by
dedicating Das Kapital, which is
considered as his greatest work, to
him. In the German edition of the
book, he wrote: "From a devoted
admirer to Charles Darwin"

Traces of this philosophy, which has a lot to answer as regards manmade
disasters of the last two centuries, can be found in every ideology
that perceives differences among people as a 'reason for conflict'. That includes
the terrorists of the present day who claim to uphold religion, yet
commit one of the greatest sins by murdering innocent people.
The theory of evolution, or Darwinism, comes in handy at this point
by completing the jigsaw puzzle. It provides the myth that materialism is
a scientific idea. That is why, Karl Marx, the founder of communism and
dialectical materialism, wrote that Darwinism was "the basis in natural
history" for his worldview.

However, that basis is rotten. Modern scientific discoveries reveal
over and over again that the popular belief associating Darwinism with
science is false. Scientific evidence refutes Darwinism comprehensively
and reveals that the origin of our existence is not evolution but creation.
God has created the universe, all living things and man.

The theory of evolution is in
complete deadlock, a fact you will discover as you read on.
You will realise that Darwinism is not a scientific
theory but a pseudo-scientific dogma upheld in the name of materialist
philosophy, despite counter evidence and outright refutation.

The Greatest Miracle of Our Times:
Belief in the Evolution Deceit

All the millions of living species on the earth possess miraculous
features, unique behavioural patterns and flawless physical
structures. Every one of these living things has been created with
its own unique detail and beauty. Plants, animals, and man above all, were
all created with great knowledge and art, from their external appearances
down to their cells, invisible to the naked eye. Today there are a great
many branches of science, and tens of thousands of scientists working in
those branches, that research every detail of those living things, uncover
the miraculous aspects of those details and try to provide an answer to the
question of how they came into being.
Some of these scientists are astonished as they discover the miraculous
aspects of these structures they study and the intelligence behind that
coming into existence, and they witness the infinite knowledge and wisdom
involved. Others, however, surprisingly claim that all these miraculous
features are the product of blind chance. These scientists believe in the
theory of evolution. In their view, the proteins, cells and organs that make
up these living things all came about by a string of coincidences. It is quite
amazing that such people, who have studied for long years, carried out
lengthy studies and written books about the miraculous functioning of just
one organelle within the cell, itself too small to be seen with the naked eye,
can think that these extraordinary structures came about by chance.
The chain of coincidences such eminent professors believe in so flies
in the face of reason that their doing so leaves outside observers utterly
amazed. According to these professors, a number of simple chemical substances
first came together and formed a protein - which is no more possible
than a randomly scattered collection of letters coming together to form
a poem. Then, other coincidences led to the emergence of other proteins.
These then also combined by chance in an organised manner. Not just proteins,
but DNA, RNA, enzymes, hormones and cell organelles, all of whichare very complex structures within the cell, coincidentally happened to
emerge and come together. As a result of these billions of coincidences, the
first cell came into being. The miraculous ability of blind chance did not
stop there, as these cells then just happened to begin to multiply. According
to the claim in question, another coincidence then organised these cells
and produced the first living thing from them.
Billions of "chance events" had to take place together for just one eye
in a living thing to form. Here too the blind process known as coincidence
entered the equation: It first opened two holes of the requisite size and in
the best possible place in the skull, and then cells that happened by chance
to find themselves in those places coincidentally began to construct the eye.
As we have seen, coincidences acted in the knowledge of what they
wanted to produce. Right from the very start, "chance" knew what seeing,
hearing and breathing were, even though there was not one example of such things anywhere in the world at that time. It displayed great intelligence
and awareness, exhibited considerable forward planning, and constructed
life step by step. This is the totally irrational scenario to which
these professors, scientists and researchers whose names are greatly respected
and whose ideas are so influential have devoted themselves. Even
now, with a childish stubbornness, they exclude anyone who refuses to believe
in such fairy tales, accusing them of being unscientific and bigoted.
There is really no difference between this and the bigoted, fanatical and ignorant
medieval mentality that punished those who claimed the earth was
not flat. What is more, some of these people claim to be Muslims and believe in
God. Such people find saying, "God created all of life" unscientific, and yet
are quite able to believe instead that saying, "It came about in an unconscious
process consisting of billions of miraculous coincidences" is scientific.
If you put a carved stone or wooden idol in front of these people and
told them, "Look, this idol created this room and everything in it" they
would say that was utterly stupid and refuse to believe it. Yet despite thatthey declare the nonsense that "The unconscious process known as chance
gradually brought this world and all the billions of wonderful living
things in it into being with enormous planning" to be the greatest scientific

The mentality of those who claim that life formed from nonliving matter by random gradual changes and
who defend this with a childish stubbornness despite all scientific evidence to the contrary, is no different
from the bigoted, fanatical and ignorant medieval mentality that punished those who claimed the earth was
not flat.

In short, these people regard chance as a god, and claim that it is intelligent,
conscious and powerful enough to create living things and all the
sensitive balances in the universe. When told that it was God, the possessor
of infinite wisdom, who created all living things, these evolutionist
professors refuse to accept the fact, and maintain that unconscious, unintelligent,
powerless billions of coincidences with no will of their own are
actually a creative force.

The fact that educated, intelligent and knowledgeable people can as a
group believe in the most irrational and illogical claim in history, as if
under a spell, is really a great miracle. In the same way that God miraculously
creates something like the cell, with its extraordinary organization
and properties, this people are just as miraculously so blind and devoid of
understanding as to be unable to see what is under their very noses. It is
one of God's miracles that evolutionists are unable to see facts that even
tiny children can, and fail to grasp them no matter how many times they
are told.
You will frequently come across that miracle as you read this post.
And you will also see that as well as being a theory that has totally collapsed
in the face of the scientific facts, Darwinism is a great deceit that is
utterly incompatible with reason and logic, and which belittles those who
defend it.

To be Continued (Let The Truth be Heard)...

User avatar
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:37 am

Postby Shantih » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Nescafe, you're almost making me embarrassed to be Christian. For the love of God, shut up.
User avatar
Posts: 1458
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:28 pm
Location: Bristol, England

Postby NESCAFE_DELIGHTS » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:52 pm

Who is forcing you to read???
User avatar
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:37 am

Postby JenR » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:59 pm

i suggested that a long time ago.

NESCAFE_DELIGHTS wrote:Who is forcing you to read???

Don't even ask that, this place is for conversation, we read posts to have conversations.

I'm getting fed up with you, too.
User avatar
Posts: 11640
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: USA - Texas

Postby JenR » Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:07 pm

oh yeah. and posts in his own thread.
User avatar
Posts: 11640
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: USA - Texas


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Erernedync, ExterceDer, Mabbourn, moisfieset, Vatowepe and 8 guests